Prediction of Gail Sherriff vs Margaret Lee Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
G. Sherriff vs M. Lee

Gail Sherriff

FRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Margaret Lee

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Sherriff 1 - 0 Lee

They have played 2 sets in total, with Gail Sherriff winning 2 and Margaret Lee winning 0. The last match between Gail Sherriff and Margaret Lee was at the Wimbledon Plate, 26-06-1967, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Gail Sherriff getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Sherriff	1
Lee	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Wimbledon Plate(06-26-67)

Stats

Gail Sherriff

Margaret Lee

G. Sherriff vs M. Lee H2H Profile

G. Sherriff	Stats	M. Lee
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
66.29% (531-270)	Career Total W/L	50.64% (79-77)
1	Grass	0
4	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

G. Sherriff vs M. Lee Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gail Sherriff has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Margaret Lee has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gail Sherriff, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Margaret Lee has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Gail Sherriff has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Margaret Lee has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Gail Sherriff has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Margaret Lee winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Gail Sherriff has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 74% (W/L 294/105), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 116/84). Margaret Lee has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 74% (W/L 46/35), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/5).
Player level: In the last year, Gail Sherriff has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Margaret Lee has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gail Sherriff winning 1 times and Margaret Lee being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gail Sherriff winning 2 and Margaret Lee winning 0.
The last match between Gail Sherriff and Margaret Lee was at the Wimbledon Plate, 26-06-1967, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Gail Sherriff getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gail Sherriff has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Margaret Lee has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gail Sherriff has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Margaret Lee has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Gail Sherriff has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Margaret Lee has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Gail Sherriff vs Margaret Lee Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

G. Sherriff vs M. Lee H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

G. Sherriff	Stats	M. Lee
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

G. Sherriff Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Le Havre - 03-12-1990
Q1 Amy Van BuurenA. Van	L	5-7 6-4 6-2	Stats
ITF Cava Tirreni - 16-07-1984
R3 Judith WarringaJ. Warringa	L	6-0 6-0	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 28-05-1984
Q1 Shelly WalpoleS. Walpole	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 24-05-1982
R1 Leslie AllenL. Allen	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 25-05-1981
R1 Deborah JevansD. Jevans	L	6-4 7-5	Stats

View All

M. Lee Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 23-06-1969
Q1 Lany KaligisL. Kaligis	L	6-3 4-6 6-4	Stats
Wimbledon Plate - 01-07-1968
R4 Marilyn AschnerM. Aschner	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 24-06-1968
R1 Faye UrbanF. Urban	L	5-7 6-0 7-5	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 10-06-1968
R3 Maria BuenoM. Bueno	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Surbiton - 27-05-1968
R2 Judith SalomeJ. Salome	W	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

G. Sherriff vs M. Lee Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

G. Sherriff	Stats	M. Lee
66.29% (531/270)	YTD Win/Loss	50.64% (79/77)
64.39% (1132/626)	Sets Win/Loss	50.00% (176/176)
56.82% (9099/6916)	Games Win/Loss	50.17% (1639/1628)
67.86% (19/9)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
73.68% (294/105)	Clay Win/Loss	56.79% (46/35)
45.45% (5/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	38.46% (5/8)
58.00% (116/84)	Grass Win/Loss	49.12% (28/29)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
21.83	Average Opponent Rank	1.74
57.41% (31/23)	Slam W/L	45.45% (5/6)
46.67% (14/16)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/2)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
58.27% (81/58)	Futures W/L	0.00% (0/4)
67% (517/774)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (74/150)
25% (1/4)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
33% (1/3)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
53% (101/192)	Deciding Set Win %	47% (23/49)
90% (530/478)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (74/59)
9% (530/49)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (74/15)
16% (255/42)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (77/16)